-
240 days' service in a calendar year by a bank employee should be in one branch.
Supreme Court 113
-
Only occupier, not all Directors, are to be prosecuted for factory offence.
Pat. HC 186
-
A Director, who had resigned, can't be held liable for provident fund dues.
Karn. HC 158
-
‘Calendar year' and ‘block of twelve months' are interchangeable.
Supreme Court 113
-
On judicial review, High Court should not sit as Appellate Authority.
Supreme Court, 176
-
Dismissal of a Bank Officer should not have been interfered by the learned Single Judge. Supreme Court 172
-
An interim order by Tribunal, can't be challenged. Supreme Court 115
-
Challenging coverage under Provident Funds without impleading employees not legal. Mad. HC 126
-
Provident Fund contributions not attracted on compensation to a reinstated employee. Mad. HC 133
-
Declaring ‘protected workmen' is not automatic process. Ker. HC 166
-
Recovering Provident Fund dues without prescribed procedure is set aside.
Bom. HC 122
-
An enquiry not necessary when removal as per conditions of appointment.
HP HC 151
-
A bank employee abandons job for his absence more than prescribed period.
Raj. HC 140
-
Adjudicator, not High Court, to decide disputed ‘employer-employee' relationship.
Cal. HC 148
-
Industrial dispute, without espousal, not maintainable. Cal. HC 148
-
No place, for generosity, while imposing punishment. Raj. HC 143
-
Gratuity cannot be withheld for want of no-objection certificate and for non-vacating of quarter. MP HC 187
-
Gratuity could not be withheld subject to conditions laid down in the statute.
MP HC 187
-
Back-wages not proper when the workman did not make any effort to find employment during interregnum. Guj. HC 200
-
Enquiry to be interfered only when it is perverse. Gau. HC 201
-
Labour Court can't travel beyond terms of reference. Del. HC 191
-
Consultant doctors providing services for some hours not to be covered under Provident Funds Act. Ker. HC 165
-
Taking cognizance of factory inspector's complaint by a Magistrate in filling up blanks to be quashed. Jhar. HC 154
-
Dismissal of workman for prolonged absence is proper. Karn. HC 161
-
Reinstatement appropriate when transfer is illegal. Mad. HC 130
-
Supervisor, exercising control upon other employees, not a ‘workman'.
Guj. HC 123
-
Enquiry by biased Enquiry Officer to be vitiated. P&H HC 138
-
Recovering EPF dues be only by adopting prescribed procedure. Karn. HC 158
-
Abandonment rightly presumed on 22 months' absence. Del. HC 178
-
Holding of enquiry for long absence not imperative. Del. HC 178
-
Reinstatement for a long absentee not justified. Del. HC 178
-
Rejection of review application by the EPF Authority not proper merely because it is in the prescribed form. Bom. HC 181
-
It is for employer to decide as to when and where an employee should be transferred. Mad. HC 183
-
Assaulting and abusing a superior will amount to serious misconduct. All. HC 116
-
Development Officer, in an Insurance Company, will be a ‘workman'. MP HC 182
-
Conveyance allowance is rightly held not ‘wages' to attract ESI contribution.
Mad. HC 172
-
Transfer to new employer without employee's consent not proper. Mad. HC 130
-
A contractor, employing less than 20 workmen, has not to obtain licence.
Cal. HC 148
-
Holding enquiry, without prescribed procedure, not legal. P&H HC 138
-
Non-disclosure of material information in the application for employment is a serious dereliction. Raj. HC 143
-
Apprentices under uncertified standing orders to be covered under Provident Fund Act. Mad. HC 126
-
Mere submission of a list of “protected workmen” is not enough for declaration.
Ker. HC 166
-
Evidence for proving misconduct can be produced if there is a request by employer. P&H HC 138
-
Reducing punishment by Labour Court must have reasons. Raj. HC 143
-
Termination of a daily wager, who completed 240 days' service will be illegal if retrenchment compensation not offered. P&H HC 136
-
Court interferes with transfer only when tainted with malafide. Mad. HC 183
-
For coverage under ‘Chemical Industry', as enumerated in Schedule I of EPF&MP Act, no notification is required. Guj. HC 197
-
Claim for gratuity upheld when employer failed to issue form ‘M'. Mad. HC 203