LEAVE ENCASHMENT NOT INCLUDED IN WAGES FOR PROVIDENT FUNDS CALCULATION : SC SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Manipal Academy of Higher Education A. EMPLOYEES' PROVIDENT FUNDS & MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS ACT, 1952 - Section 2(b), Basic Wages - Encashment of leave not to attract provident fund contributions - Reliance placed by EPFO on Hindustan Lever Employees Union Vs. Regional Provident Fund Commissioner , 1995 LLR 416 (Bom. HC) including encashment of leave in basic wages was not proper prospective - The employer was including the amount of leave encashment as emolument for the purpose of calculating the provident funds dues for the employer as well as employees' contributions - The term “basic wages” though includes ‘all emoluments' which are earned by an employee while on duty or on leave or on holiday with wages - Would not take leave encashment of - In view of the Supreme Court judgment in Bridges and Roof Company case, the inevitable conclusion is that basic wages are never intended to include encashment of leave. Para 12 B. EMPLOYEES' PROVIDENT FUNDS & MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS ACT, 1952 - Interpretation of its provisions - Though beneficial legislation - It becomes irrelevant when two views are possible - Appeal pertaining to exclusion of encashment of leave allowed with direction that any payment already made can be adjusted for future liabilities and there shall not be any refund since refund is running one. Para 14
Editor's Note : Full judgment will be published in April 2008 issue of the Labour Law Reporter. If required complete text of the judgment, kindly remit sum of Rs.75/- which can be deposited in our account number 01342320000014 at HDFC Bank in favour of Labour Law Reporter anywhere in India .
|