Casual employees to be covered under ESI.
2016 LLR 437
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Chairman not managing day-to-day affairs can''t be prosecuted for violation of Minimum Wages Act.
2016 LLR 349
GUJARAT HIGH COURT
If residential accommodation is not a condition of service, employees have no right to continue.
2016 LLR 425
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Continuous unauthorized absenteeism will justify termination.
2016 LLR 353
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Court cannot reject the reference of dispute.
2016 LLR 338
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Workman can choose the Court/Forum to sue the employer
2016 LLR 337
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Dismissal justified for negligence resulting into loss to employer.
2016 LLR 403
GAUHATI HIGH COURT
No perversity in directing Regional Provident Fund Commissioner for identification of workers.
2016 LLR 375
GUJARAT HIGH COURT
Gratuity cannot be denied even if employee does not claim for past service.
2016 LLR 370
MADRAS HIGH COURT
Reinstatement of a Dy. Manager (Security) holding managerial position to be quashed.
2016 LLR 372
JHARKHAND HIGH COURT
Reviewing authority under Provident Fund Act must pass speaking order.
2016 LLR 413
ORISSA HIGH COURT
Plea not taken before EPF Tribunal not tenable in Writ Court.
2016 LLR 409
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Dismissal of conductor for receiving fare and not issuing tickets is justified.
2016 LLR 429
DELHI HIGH COURT
An employee empowered to select/ appoint persons, not a ''workman''.
2016 LLR 431
DELHI HIGH COURT
Ex-parte enquiry is justified on failure of delinquent to participate.
2016 LLR 353
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Getting extensions without murmur, the probationer can''t justify performance.
2016 LLR 340
DELHI HIGH COURT
Clubbing of Samithi and Trust for coverage under Provident Fund Act is proper.
2016 LLR 387
KERALA HIGH COURT
Penalty not justified when enquiry is biased.
2016 LLR 398
GAUHATI HIGH COURT
Misconduct being foundation, termination of probationer will be illegal.
2016 LLR 385
GUJARAT HIGH COURT
Preliminary finding of enquiry not to be challenged in Writ Petition.
2016 LLR 355
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
A Company is responsible through its officer, having ultimate control over its affairs.
2016 LLR 362
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
Termination of probationer on overall performance does not amount to removal as punishment.
2016 LLR 340
DELHI HIGH COURT
Reinstatement justified on termination sans compensation.
2016 LLR 360
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
In domestic enquiry, charges are to be proved on preponderance of probabilities.
2016 LLR 403
GAUHATI HIGH COURT
An enquiry sticking to natural justice, not to be interfered.
2016 LLR 403
GAUHATI HIGH COURT
Gratuity can be forfeited only on termination for specified misconducts.
2016 LLR 370
MADRAS HIGH COURT
Govt. can transfer industrial dispute from one Court to another.
2016 LLR 365
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Unless 240 days working is proved by a workman, compliance of section 25F of I.D. Act is not needed.
2016 LLR 364
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Denial of approval for dismissal of bus conductor not proper since standard is not rigid in enquiries.
2016 LLR 394
RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Fairness of enquiry depends upon procedure followed in enquiry.
2016 LLR 406
DELHI HIGH COURT
Official car driven by driver, creates presumption of his doing official work.
2016 LLR 419
BOMBAY HIGH COURT
Nature of Duty determines whether employee is a ''workman'' or not.
2016 LLR 431
DELHI HIGH COURT
Court can''t direct government to refer a dispute for adjudication.
2016 LLR 338
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Monetary claim on existing right is tenable u/s 33C (2) of the I.D. Act.
2016 LLR 358
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Plea of illness without a medical record is not tenable.
2016 LLR 353
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Order of reference to be adjudicated even if parties don''t appear.
2016 LLR 356
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Lump sum amount paid towards ''basic wages'' would attract Provident Fund contributions.
2016 LLR 345
DELHI HIGH COURT
ESI Act is to be interpreted for benefits of employees.
2016 LLR 337
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
School will be an ''industry'' under Industrial Disputes Act.
2016 LLR 360
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
Payment of gratuity is employer''s responsibility.
2016 LLR 370
MADRAS HIGH COURT
Inconvenience is not a decisive factor while interpreting a statute.
2016 LLR 367
PATNA HIGH COURT
Labour Court is to consider only whether procedure of enquiry was proper or not.
2016 LLR 406
DELHI HIGH COURT
Employer must obtain approval from competent authority stipulated by Industrial Disputes Act.
2016 LLR 411
MADRAS HIGH COURT
Interference by writ jurisdiction permissible if inference of Labour Court is perverse.
2016 LLR 419
BOMBAY HIGH COURT
In case of violation of terms of lease, lessee will have locus standi to protest.
2016 LLR 425
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
