Prohibition of contract labour system, after consultation with Central Board, is not to be interfered.
2013 LLR 449
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Picketing, agitation and slogan shouting are to be prohibited within 500 metres of premises.
2013 LLR 509
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
Termination of a probationer for sympathizing Maoists is not legal.
2013 LLR 462
ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT
Enquiry is not necessary on termination of contractual service.
2013 LLR 506
MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT
Persons engaged without remuneration not ''employees'' under EPF Act
2013 LLR 458
MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT
No reinstatement for unauthorized and wilful absence.
2013 LLR 465
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
Reinstatement with back-wages is not automatic for non-compliance of section 25F of ID Act.
2013 LLR 486
RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Reinstatement with back-wages is not automatic for non-compliance of section 25F of ID Act.
2013 LLR 486
RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Dismissal for medical unfitness, without enquiry, is not proper.
2013 LLR 490
MADRAS HIGH COURT
Principal employer is liable for ESI contributions.
2013 LLR 496
ORISSA HIGH COURT
Principal employer is to ensure welfare facilities if contractor fails to do so.
2013 LLR 509
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
A person giving services voluntarily is not an ''employee'' under EPF & MP Act.
2013 LLR 458
MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT
Imposition of punishment is for employer not the court.
2013 LLR 525
DELHI HIGH COURT
Gratuity can be forfeited only for prescribed misconduct.
2013 LLR 531
BOMBAY HIGH COURT
Prosecution for ESI violation may be sparingly quashed.
2013 LLR 546
KERALA HIGH COURT
Embezzlement will constitute moral turpitude for forfeiture of gratuity.
2013 LLR 540
HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT
Notification prohibiting contract labour system should not be nullified by courts in casual manner.
2013 LLR 449
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
No prejudice to an employer if delinquents are represented through union leader in the enquiry.
2013 LLR 457
GUJARAT HIGH COURT
No employee should be harassed merely because he is related to an extremist.
2013 LLR 462
ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT
Right of expression, if suppressed, would reduce democracy to only on paper.
2013 LLR 462
ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT
Provident Funds Act is distinct from civil proceedings in context with recovery of dues and penal consequences.
2013 LLR 455
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Courts not to interfere with show cause notice by ESIC
2013 LLR 496
ORISSA HIGH COURT
Deposit collectors are to be covered under Provident Fund Act
2013 LLR 470
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
EPF Act not applicable, if total employees are less than 20.
2013 LLR 458
MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT
Reinstatement with consequential relief will mean seniority for promotion.
2013 LLR 460
HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT
No relief, when unauthorized absence is not for compelling circumstances.
2013 LLR 465
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
Reasons are must for modifying punishment by Labour Court
2013 LLR 467
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
Labour Court will not interfere in punishment when enquiry is upheld.
2013 LLR 467
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
Employer''s failure to pay EPF dues would justify recovery proceedings.
2013 LLR 453
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
An erroneous Award by Labour Court is liable to be set aside.
2013 LLR 501
ORISSA HIGH COURT
An award, based on surmises, is to be set aside.
2013 LLR 472
DELHI HIGH COURT
Dismissal after proper enquiry is not to be interfered.
2013 LLR 472
DELHI HIGH COURT
Strict principles of Evidence Act not applicable in domestic enquiries.
2013 LLR 472
DELHI HIGH COURT
No discrimination on termination of probationer who failed to bring minimum business.
2013 LLR 476
DELHI HIGH COURT
Confirmation of a probationer is not always imperative.
2013 LLR 476
DELHI HIGH COURT
Dismissal without enquiry or compensation is possible if the Regulations so provide.
2013 LLR 478
DELHI HIGH COURT
Dismissal is not disproportionate when the charge proved in criminal trial is of serious nature i.e. rash and negligent in driving.
2013 LLR 478
DELHI HIGH COURT
Artificial breaks not covered by section 2(oo)(bb) of the ID Act.
2013 LLR 482
DELHI HIGH COURT
Repetition of contractual appointments will amount to unfair labour practice.
2013 LLR 482
DELHI HIGH COURT
Compensation is appropriate on wrongful termination of an irregular workman.
2013 LLR 482
DELHI HIGH COURT
In the absence of clear findings regarding functional integrality, interference in the order of the Appellate Authority is not warranted.
2013 LLR 484
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
For clubbing of establishments for EPF coverage, ''functional integrality'' is imperative
2013 LLR 484
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Finding of facts by the Labour Court can''t be challenged in writ petition.
2013 LLR 486
RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Compensation, instead of reinstatement, is appropriate when long time has passed.
2013 LLR 489
RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Compensation, instead of reinstatement, is appropriate when long time has passed.
2013 LLR 490
MADRAS HIGH COURT
Reinstatement is appropriate on non-compliance of section 25F of ID Act.
2013 LLR 489
RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Non-regularisation unjustified when junior was regularized
2013 LLR 489
RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Refusing to appear before Medical Board will amount to disobedience.
2013 LLR 490
MADRAS HIGH COURT
An industrial dispute can''t be converted into a complaint under section 33-A of ID Act.
2013 LLR 490
MADRAS HIGH COURT
Conciliation Officer not empowered to adjudicate a complaint under section 33A of ID Act.
2013 LLR 490
MADRAS HIGH COURT
Any settlement, contrary to law, can''t exonerate the employer from its statutory obligations.
2013 LLR 496
ORISSA HIGH COURT
Statutory facilities, if not provided by contractor, can''t exonerate the principal employer.
2013 LLR 496
ORISSA HIGH COURT
Non-fundamental rights can also be enforced by High Court.
2013 LLR 509
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
No relief when termination is under section 2(oo) (bb) of ID Act.
2013 LLR 506
MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT
Abandonment is rightly presumed when employee fails to report/respond the offers.
2013 LLR 506
MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT
Under EPF Act ''employee'' means as employed for wages.
2013 LLR 458
MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT
Demand of documents, if not specific, will not have any adverse affect upon the enquiry proceedings.
2013 LLR 525
DELHI HIGH COURT
If defaulting bus conductor admits his mistake, non-production of passengers as witnesses is not fatal.
2013 LLR 531
BOMBAY HIGH COURT
High Court can interfere in an Award only when it is perverse.
2013 LLR 525
DELHI HIGH COURT
Gratuity Act is a beneficial legislation for employees.
2013 LLR 531
BOMBAY HIGH COURT
Interest accrues on delay in payment of gratuity.
2013 LLR 531
BOMBAY HIGH COURT
An employer is bound to produce records if demanded by ESI Authority.
2013 LLR 546
KERALA HIGH COURT
Occupier must have control on the affairs of the factory.
2013 LLR 546
KERALA HIGH COURT
Gratuity is to be forfeited on termination for moral turpitude.
2013 LLR 540
HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT
Opportunity of hearing before forfeiture of gratuity is not necessary.
2013 LLR 540
HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT
Judicial admission of facts is best evidence.
2013 LLR 540
HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT
Full-back wages is not proper when workman did not state his unemployment.
2013 LLR 521
DELHI HIGH COURT
50% back-wages on pendency of dispute for long time is proper
2013 LLR 521
DELHI HIGH COURT
Initial burden of unemployment during interregnum is on workman.
2013 LLR 521
DELHI HIGH COURT
Non-furnishing of enquiry report will not affect dismissal when prejudice not alleged.
2013 LLR 515
DELHI HIGH COURT
