Prosecution of Occupier/Manager for an accident, in factory, is to be quashed if launched after 3 months.
		
            
            2014 LLR 897 
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
            
			
              Office bearers of a trade union have no privilege for misconduct.
		
            
            2014 LLR 972 
MADRAS HIGH COURT
            
			
              Termination for long absence, due to illness, supported with genuine medical certificates is not justified.
		
            
            2014 LLR 901 
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
            
			
              Reinstatement and back-wages are not automatic.
		
            
            2014 LLR 950
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
            
			
              Clubbing for coverage under provident fund can be done when one unit cannot exist without the other
		
            
            2014 LLR 958 
CALCUTTA HIGH COURT 
            
			
              PFC is bound by order of EPF Appellate Tribunal and not entitled to challenge.
		
            
            2014 LLR 963 
CALCUTTA HIGH COURT 
            
			
              Taking Rs.1,000 from a guest, by a hotel employee, to procure a floozy would justify his dismissal. 
		
            
            2014 LLR 911 
DELHI HIGH COURT
            
			
              Senior Stores Officer, in the managerial cadre, will not be a ''workman''.
		
            
            2014 LLR 916 
DELHI HIGH COURT
            
			
              Dismissal for go slow and frequent strikes, when proved, would be justified. 
		
            
            2014 LLR 972 
MADRAS HIGH COURT
            
			
              No enquiry is required for termination of a probationer.
		
            
            2014 LLR 985 
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
            
			
              Employee, not the employer, has to prove 240 days of working.
		
            
            2014 LLR 934 
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
            
			
              Criminal liability for violation of PF Act remains upon perpetrator. 
		
            
            2014 LLR 905 
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
            
			
              Demand notice, not replied by employer, will support the claim of workman.
		
            
            2014 LLR 920 
DELHI HIGH COURT
            
			
              EPF Authority under section 7-A is vested with powers of a civil court.
		
            
            2014 LLR 940 
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
            
			
              Insisting for separate code number for Provident Fund for different unit of establishment not justified.
		
            
            2014 LLR 958 
CALCUTTA HIGH COURT 
            
			
              Gratuity and retiral benefits cannot be withheld
		
            
            2014 LLR 964 
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
            
			
              Declining to call witnesses without reason would vitiate enquiry.
		
            
            2014 LLR 901 
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
            
			
              Labour Court is empowered to examine correctness of enquiry findings
		
            
            2014 LLR 931 
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
            
			
              Adverse inference will be drawn when employer fails to produce records.
		
            
            2014 LLR 934 
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
            
			
              Belated dispute, without justifiable delay, would not be ''industrial dispute''.
		
            
            2014 LLR 936 
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
            
			
              Damages for delayed deposit of provident fund dues can be recovered from transferor and transferee of establishment.
		
            
            2014 LLR 905 
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
            
			
              Averments of workman when not rebutted would justify his claim.
		
            
            2014 LLR 920 
DELHI HIGH COURT
            
			
              Whether an establishment is new for applicability of Provident Funds Act is to be decided in appeal.
		
            
            2014 LLR 949 
CALCUTTA HIGH COURT 
            
			
              Determining provident fund dues without summoning the relevant documents is to be set aside.
		
            
            2014 LLR 940 
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
            
			
              Employee is to prove his employment to receive accident compensation.
		
            
            2014 LLR 928 
DELHI HIGH COURT
            
			
              Claimant for compensation must prove that the accident arose out of employment.
		
            
            2014 LLR 925 
DELHI HIGH COURT
            
			
              Compensation is appropriate when termination was before 30 years.
		
            
            2014 LLR 950
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
            
			
              Back-wages rightly denied when the employees refuse to work at other place after their place of work was gutted.
		
            
            2014 LLR 962 
CALCUTTA HIGH COURT 
            
			
              Reinstatement of hotel employee quashed when he acted as a pimp. 
		
            
            2014 LLR 911 
DELHI HIGH COURT
            
			
              Signature on appointment letter is conclusive proof of date of appointment.
		
            
            2014 LLR 981 
DELHI HIGH COURT
            
			
              Belated claim for compensation would not justify the claim.
		
            
            2014 LLR 928 
DELHI HIGH COURT
            
			
              Termination without retrenchment compensation would be illegal. 
		
            
            2014 LLR 990 
HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT 
            
			
              Solitary statement of workman not sufficient to prove 240 days of working.
		
            
            2014 LLR 936 
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
            
			
              Rs.5 lakhs towards compensation, in lieu of reinstatement, would be appropriate.
		
            
            2014 LLR 967 
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
            
			
              Gratuity rightly withheld when, despite undertaking, the employee did not vacate the accommodation.
		
            
            2014 LLR 966 
JHARKHAND HIGH COURT 
            
			
              Workman will be debarred from challenging termination if notice was only for bonus.
		
            
            2014 LLR 981 
DELHI HIGH COURT
            
			
              Probationer can be terminated without any reason during probation period.
		
            
            2014 LLR 985 
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
            
			
              Limitation not applicable, for restoration of appeal, before EPF Appellate Tribunal.
		
            
            2014 LLR 923 
DELHI HIGH COURT
            
			
              Reinstatement would follow the non-compliance of section 25F of ID Act.
		
            
            2014 LLR 930 
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
            
			
              Death of an employee even from pre-existing decease would justify accident compensation.
		
            
            2014 LLR 952 
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT 
            
			
              Reinstatement appropriate when the medical certificates, during absence, not contradicted by the employer.
		
            
            2014 LLR 901 
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
            
			
              Employer can adduce evidence before labour court in support of application.
		
            
            2014 LLR 931 
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
            
			
              Compliance of section 25F of ID Act is not required when 240 days working not proved.
		
            
            2014 LLR 936 
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
            
			
              Newspaper report is not evidence for proving employment.
		
            
            2014 LLR 925 
DELHI HIGH COURT
            
			
              EPF Authority not to challenge the quashing of order by EPF Provident Fund Commissioner.
		
            
            2014 LLR 956 
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT 
            
			
              While challenging the applicability of ESI upon an establishment, affected employees are to be impleaded in appeal.
		
            
            2014 LLR 970 
KERALA HIGH COURT 
            
			
              Compensation Commissioner can direct deposit of compensation when he comes to know about accidental death from any source.
		
            
            2014 LLR 978 
BOMBAY HIGH COURT
            
			
              No retrenchment compensation payable on termination of a probationer.
		
            
            2014 LLR 985 
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
            
			
              Accident compensation, when wrongly paid, can be recovered.
		
            
            2014 LLR 925 
DELHI HIGH COURT
            
			
              Writ petition filed after 32 months not tenable. 
		
            
            2014 LLR 981 
DELHI HIGH COURT
            
			
              Deposit of compensation by employer cannot be insisted when he denies the relationship of employer and employee.
		
            
            2014 LLR 978 
BOMBAY HIGH COURT