Termination sans retrenchment compensation would be illegal.
2015 LLR 990
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Termination sans retrenchment compensation would be illegal.
2015 LLR 936
HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT
Misappropriation is a grave misconduct justifying dismissal.
2015 LLR 969
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
Provident Fund Act once applicable will continue to apply even if number of workers is reduced.
2015 LLR 986
TRIPURA HIGH COURT
Canteen workers through contractor(s) when controlled and supervised by principal employer will be regularised.
2015 LLR 974
BOMBAY HIGH COURT
Clubbing of two independent establishments for coverage under provident fund is not proper.
2015 LLR 971
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
An ''employer'' under provident fund does not include managing director or manager.
2015 LLR 927
CALCUTTA HIGH COURT
Go slow; shut down, strike and abusive language will justify dismissal. Bom HC 920 Reinstatement with back-wages to follow an illegal termination.
2015 LLR 990
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Last drawn wages during pendency of proceedings in higher court untenable when workman is gainfully employed.
2015 LLR 933
GUJARAT HIGH COURT
Reference of an industrial dispute to be set aside, if not made by appropriate Government.
2015 LLR 961
RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
One who has ultimate control over the affairs of a factory is employer under Factories Act.
2015 LLR 927
CALCUTTA HIGH COURT
Dismissal for slapping a colleague is shockingly disproportionate punishment.
2015 LLR 897
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Declining to adjourn enquiry proper when no prejudice is caused to the employee.
2015 LLR 918
BOMBAY HIGH COURT
Unless there is perversity, the court should not interfere in the punishment.
2015 LLR 920
BOMBAY HIGH COURT
Appeal against levy of interest on delayed payment will not be tenable before EPF Tribunal.
2015 LLR 900
DELHI HIGH COURT
Functional integrality depends whether one unit can survive in the absence of other.
2015 LLR 971
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
Compensation would be appropriate when employer has lost confidence in employee.
2015 LLR 952
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
A plea when not taken in ''Statement of Claim'' can''t be improved.
2015 LLR 956
RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
An employer cannot unilaterally demote an employee without reasons.
2015 LLR 963
UTTARAKHAND HIGH COURT
Absence of employer-employee relation would not justify regularisation of employees.
2015 LLR 939
KERALA HIGH COURT
Contractors covered under Provident Fund Act cannot deny to furnish detail of employees.
2015 LLR 982
JHARKHAND HIGH COURT
Employees of a statutory canteen run by contractor would be treated as employees of the principal employer.
2015 LLR 974
BOMBAY HIGH COURT
Approval for dismissal when declined, would amount to continuity of service.
2015 LLR 981
CALCUTTA HIGH COURT
Employer-employee relationship is established when the employee had the authority to represent the employer.
2015 LLR 986
TRIPURA HIGH COURT
Dismissal of security person is not disproportionate when guilty of shouting and spoiling the discipline.
2015 LLR 918
BOMBAY HIGH COURT
Dismissal justified when the workman was unruly as proved.
2015 LLR 920
BOMBAY HIGH COURT
Belated demand of provident fund dues would not be vitiated.
2015 LLR 900
DELHI HIGH COURT
Denial of documents to the delinquent would vitiate enquiry.
2015 LLR 946
ORISSA HIGH COURT
Reinstatement with wages not proper even when termination is held illegal.
2015 LLR 952
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Illness when not supported with evidence would not justify absence.
2015 LLR 984
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Interference by the Labour Court in punishment is called only when it is shocking and disproportionate.
2015 LLR 918
BOMBAY HIGH COURT
Departmental circular cannot overrule the provisions of a statute.
2015 LLR 900
DELHI HIGH COURT
Absence of positive evidence will vitiate the enquiry.
2015 LLR 966
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
Termination of a daily-wager for stealing employers'' property is justified.
2015 LLR 952
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Canteen employees will be of principal employer only under section 46 of the Factories Act.
2015 LLR 939
KERALA HIGH COURT
Termination for absence after holding enquiry would be justified.
2015 LLR 984
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Compensation instead of reinstatement would be appropriate when past record of delinquent employee was unblemished.
2015 LLR 897
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Employees of contract labour will be absorbed when certain is run in principal employer''s premises.
2015 LLR 974
BOMBAY HIGH COURT
Over time payment will not attract provident fund contribution.
2015 LLR 986
TRIPURA HIGH COURT
Levying damages for delayed payment is meant to act as deterrent.
2015 LLR 900
DELHI HIGH COURT
Apprentices under Apprentices Act not to be covered under ESI.
2015 LLR 943
KERALA HIGH COURT
A married sister is not dependent to the claim accident compensation.
2015 LLR 951
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Worker engaged merely for two three days not coverable under ESI.
2015 LLR 954
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Notice of change not required on termination/retrenchment.
2015 LLR 956
RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Simultaneous payment of one month notice and retrenchment compensation would comply with conditions for retrenchment.
2015 LLR 956
RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Back-wages of a workman whose approval has been declined, can claim under section 33C(2) of I.D. Act.
2015 LLR 981
CALCUTTA HIGH COURT
